Nimzo-Indian: Rubinstein Variation
1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 e6 3.Nc3 Bb4 · E40–E59
Part of Nimzo-Indian Defense
Starting positionWhite to move
0 / 17
The bishop pair versus doubled c-pawns
- 1.
- 2.
- 3.
- 4.
- 5.
- 6.
- 7.
- 8.
- 9.
The idea
White defers the decision with e3 and Bd3, and Black completes development before the tension on c3 finally resolves.
Main line: 1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 e6 3.Nc3 Bb4 4.e3 O-O 5.Bd3 d5 6.Nf3 c5 7.O-O Nc6 8.a3 Bxc3 9.bxc3
What White wants
- Develop with Bd3, Nf3 and O-O and keep all options open
- Decide on a3 only when Black has committed to ...d5 and ...c5
- Use the bishop pair and the central pawn mass
What Black wants
- Complete development with ...d5, ...c5 and ...Nc6
- If exchanging on c3, concede White the bishop pair in return for doubled c-pawns
- Pressure the doubled c-pawns and challenge the central pawn mass
Key idea
Understand this and the moves stop needing to be memorised.
The bishop pair versus doubled c-pawns
a3 asks the b4 bishop to retreat or capture. In the illustrated line, ...Bxc3 and bxc3 leave White with two bishops and pawns on c3 and c4. Black gains pawn targets but gives up a bishop; central activity decides which concession matters more.
Common mistake
Playing a3 without considering the resulting centre. White is not giving up the bishop pair: Black is. The doubled pawns still need support, so develop and prepare central breaks instead of assuming two bishops guarantee an advantage.
Representative position
The position this opening is aiming at. Copy the FEN, or open it in the analysis board and let the engine tell you what it is worth.
r1bq1rk1/pp3ppp/2n1pn2/2pp4/2PP4/P1PBPN2/5PPP/R1BQ1RK1 b - - 0 9
Analyze this position